Not every rooftop needs more hardware.
SolaLinx investigates where limited roof area, asset condition or future capital decisions create a case for deeper evidence and, where justified, controlled validation of a physical intervention.
● C&I Rooftop PV
Is this rooftop worth intervening in?
Potentially stronger cases include constrained usable roof area, high-value coincident load, ageing PV assets, planned repowering or storage, incomplete asset records, or portfolios where intervention value differs materially by site.
What are the alternatives?
Possible outcomes include no action, maintenance or repair, monitoring correction, repowering, replacement, storage or future LightEnhancer validation. LightEnhancer should progress only where the evidence supports it.
What evidence is needed before capital is committed?
YieldCore™ can support progression from initial assessment through validation readiness and, where justified, treated/reference testing.
01
Assess the constraint
Assess whether the rooftop constraint and the decision justify deeper evidence.
02
Compare alternatives
Compare no action, maintenance, repair, monitoring correction, repowering, replacement and storage.
03
Validate if justified
Where justified, treated/reference testing can establish whether a physical intervention creates a real and material result.
04
Decide next step
The objective is a defensible next decision — not an assumed uplift.